29 Wash. App. 642 - State v. Maesse’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably Staats v. Brown (2000), Staats v. Brown (2000)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State Penitentiary · United States v. Bernard · 83 Wash. 2d 424 - State v. Gluck · 40 Wash. 2d 18 - State v. Goebel · 91 Wash. 2d 86 - State v. Adams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in those circumstances where police officers are acting together as a unit, cumulative knowledge of all the officers involved in the arrest may be considered in deciding whether there was probable cause to apprehend a particular suspect.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“provides that an arresting officer who does not personally possess sufficient information to constitute probable cause may still make a warrantless arrest if(1) he acts upon the direction or as a result of a communication from a fellow officer, and (2)the police, as a whole, possess sufficient information to constitute probable cause.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“"where the facts and circumstances within the arresting officer's knowledge and of which he has reasonably trustworthy information are sufficient in themselves to warrant a man of reasonable caution in a belief that an offense has been . . . committed."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.