Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 29 Wash. App. 679 - State v. Bradfield

29 Wash. App. 679 - State v. Bradfield’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
July 2021
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently July 2021

22 state decisions

9019811990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 89 Wash. 2d 613 - State v. Young · 93 Wash. 2d 454 - State v. Dailey · United States v. Lorenzo · 69 Wash. 2d 256 - State v. Whitney · 73 Wash. 2d 58 - State v. Brewer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]f at any time during the course of the proceedings it is brought to the attention of the court that a party has failed to comply with an applicable discovery rule or an order issued pursuant thereto, the court may order such party to permit the discovery of material and information not previously disclosed, grant a continuance, dismiss the action or enter such other order as it deems just under the circumstances.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) a delay of such length alone as to amount to a denial of the right to a speedy trial; (2) prejudice to the defense arising from the delay; (3) a purposeful delay designed by the state to oppress the defendant; or (4) long and undue imprisonment in jail awaiting trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “This court from its early days has been committed to the rule that questions determined on appeal or questions which might have been determined had they been presented, will not again be considered on a subsequent appeal in the same case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.