Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 29 WIS 400 - Mills v. Charleton

Mills v. Charleton’s Empirical Analysis

1872

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
24
states following
November 1992
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 53 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently November 1992 · most notably Phillip Wagner v. Oscar Leser a B W (1915), City of Seattle v. Daniel Kelleher W (1904)

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 53 state decisions — followed in 24 states

1601872188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It moves constantly forward to its object until that is accomplished, and, if turned aside by any obstacles or impediments, may return again and again to the same tax or assessment, until, the way being clear, the tax is paid or the assessment collected. Such is the force of this power, or of the sovereign body which exercises it, that it may remove all obstacles, and never cease to act until it has attained the appointed end for which it was delegated.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The reassessment of a tax, the proceedings for the collection of which have once failed, is not a reopening of the judgment by which such former proceedings were declared invalid. Such judgment remains a perpetual stay of the proceedings to enforce the first assessment, but it only affects that assessment, and does not operate upon new proceedings subsequently taken to reassess.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““The power to impose taxes is one so unlimited in force and so searching in extent, that the courts scarcely venture to declare that it is subject to any restrictions whatever, except such as rest in the discretion of the authority which exercises it.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.