Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

29 Wyo. 33

Bock v. Nefsy

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1922

Wyoming Supreme Court · decided 1922-07-20

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

““No writ of error shall be necessary to present for review in the supreme court any judgment or order heretofore removable thereto by such writ of error, but any such judgment or order may be thérein reviewed by direct appeal, and the words ‘writ of error,’ where used in the laws of this state, shall be held to mean and include ‘appeal’.””

quoted by 1 later decision, including State v. Scott

Relies on Greenawalt v. Natrona Improvement Co. · Turner v. Hamilton · Menardi v. Omalley

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1922-07-20

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently May 1962

9 state decisions

3019221930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Kimball, Justice.

¶1This case is here by direct appeal and the respondent moves to dismiss the appeal because there is no judgment or final order to support it.

¶2The record discloses that a demurrer to plaintiff’s amended petition was sustained, but no judgment was entered. *34The plaintiff undertook to appeal to this court from the order sustaining the demurrer.

¶3By section 6401, Wyo. C. S. 1920, the first section of the direct appeal statute, it is provided that:

“No writ of error shall be necessary to present for review in the supreme court any judgment or order heretofore removable thereto by such writ of error, but any such judgment or order may be therein reviewed by direct appeal, and the words ‘writ of error,’ where used in the laws of this state, shall be held to mean and include ‘appeal.’ ”

¶4Writs of error to reverse, vacate or modify judgments or final orders in civil cases have been unknown in our practice for many years (§ 6392, Wyo. C. S. 1920), and to give effect to the language of the foregoing section it is understood that the legislature in using the term “writ of error” intended to refer to that proceeding which is commenced here by the filing of a petition in error and the issuance and service of a summons thereon. (§ 6373, Wyo. C. S. 1920.) It is clear that it was intended by the direct appeal statute to provide another method for bringing to this court for review the same class of cases which theretofore could be brought here by such proceedings in error. It has been decided several times that an order sustaining a demurrer is neither a judgment nor a final order within the meaning of sections 6369 and 6371, and that a proceeding in error will not lie therefrom. (Menardi v. O’Malley, 3 Wyo. 327, 23 Pac. 68; Turner v. Hamilton, 10 Wyo. 177, 67 Pac. 1117; Greenawalt v. Imp. Co., 16 Wyo. 226, 92 Pac. 1008; Owen v. S. & E. Ry. Co., 19 Wyo. 409, 118 Pac. 652.)

¶5It follows that an appeal cannot be taken from such an order.

¶6The appeal is dismissed.

Blume, J., concurs. PotteR, Ch. J., being ill, did not sit.
/29/wyo/33 · .json · Public domain