Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 290 AD2D 206 - Cox v. Microsoft Corp.

Cox v. Microsoft Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
April 2013
most recently cited

4 district · 4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “private persons cannot bring a class action under the Donnelly Act because the treble damages remedy provided in General Business Law § 340 is a `penalty' within the meaning of CPLR 901(b), the recovery of which in a class action is not specifically authorized and the imposition of which cannot be waived.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Federal case law is at best persuasive in the absence of state authority; it is largely irrelevant to a peculiarly local question.... In drafting CPLR 901(b), the Legislature must be deemed to have chosen its language with reference to New York law, not its federal counterpart.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[i]t has long been recognized that a provision for the trebling of damages is penal and subject to strict construction”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.