Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
41 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently February 2023 · most notably Carton v. Missouri Pacific Railroad (1990), King v. State (1994)
41 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kitchen v. State · Hamblin v. State · Fountain v. State · Orsini v. State · MacKey v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Mr. Bearden [Prosecutor]: Did he have something in his hand, ...? Note: Witness nods affirmatively. Mr. Bearden: What, do you remember? Note: Witness nods affirmatively. Mr. Bearden: What was it? Note: No audible response. Mr. Bearden: Do you remember what it was? Note: Witness nods affirmatively. Mr. Bearden: What was it? Tell me. Note: No audible response. Mr. Bearden: Just look up and tell me. What was it? Witness: Case knife. . . . . . Mr. Bearden: His what? What did he touch you with? Witness: His(long pause) Mr. Bearden: His what? Witness: His tongue. . . . . . Mr. Bearden: Can you point and show me where his head was? Note: Witness points. Mr. Bearden: You are pointing down between your legs? Note: Witness nods affirmatively. Mr. Bearden: Yes? Witness: Yes. . . . . . Mr. Bearden: Could you feel him touching your private parts with his tongue,...? Witness: Yes. . . . . . Mr. Bearden: Did you see his private parts? Witness: Yes. Mr. Bearden: Yes? Did he touch you with his private parts, ...? Witness: Yes. Mr. Bearden: Did he hurt you? Note: Witness nods affirmatively. Mr. Bearden: Yes? Witness: Yes. . . . . . Mr. Bearden: Could you feel his private parts inside your private parts, ...? Witness: Yes. . . . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jackson v. State“Hearsay Exceptions Availability of declarant immaterial. The following are not excluded by the hearsay rule, even though the declarant is available as a witness: (2) Excited utterance. A statement relating to a startling event or condition made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement caused by the event or conditions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jackson v. State“(1) `deviate sexual activity' means any act of sexual gratification involving: (b) the penetration, however, slight, of the vagina or anus of one person by any body member or foreign instrument manipulated by another person. (9) `sexual intercourse' means penetration, however slight, of a vagina by a penis.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jackson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.