Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 290 BR 387 - In Re Schlehr

In Re Schlehr’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
March 2017
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 502 · 11 U.S.C. § 506 · 20 U.S.C. § 1091A · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157 · 28 U.S.C. § 2075

Relies on Preiser v. Rodriguez · Johnson v. Home State Bank · Busic v. United States · 26 663 74447 Allegheny International Inc · Wright v. Holm

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Collection charges. Whether or not provided for in the borrower’s promissory note and subject to any limitation on the amount of those costs in that note, the guaranty agency shall charge a borrower an amount equal to reasonable costs incurred by the agency in collecting a loan on which the agency has paid a default or bankruptcy claim. These costs may include, but are not limited to, all attorney’s fees, collection agency charges, and court costs. Except as provided in § 682.401(b)(27) and § 682.405(b)(l)(iv), the amount charged a borrower must equal the lesser of— (i) The amount the same borrower would be charged for the cost of collection under the formula in 34 CFR 30.60; or (ii) The amount the same borrower would be charged for the cost of collection if the loan was held by the U.S. Department of Education.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.