In Re King’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 1322 · 11 U.S.C. § 1330 · 11 U.S.C. § 506
Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Johnson v. Home State Bank · Nobelman v. American Savings Bank · Target Corp. v. Hollister · Lawrence Tractor Co. v. Gregory
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“notice must be reasonably calculated to bring to the party's attention the nature and substance of the pending determination, i.e. the extent of the adverse effect on the party's rights (the qualitative aspect), and it must afford a reasonable time in which to respond (the quantitative aspect).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Bryan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.