In Re Tayler

In re TAYLER F. et al.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 16, 2008.

Supreme Court of Connecticut · decided 2008-12-16

Relies on 111 Conn. App. 28 - In Re Tayler F.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2008-12-16

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably In Re Tayler F. (2010), 118 Conn. App. 670 - Farnum v. Commissioner of Correction (2009)

31 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Jon D. Golas, Manchester, in support of the petition.

¶2Sheila A. Huddleston, John H. Beers, Hartford, and Benjamin Zivyon, assistant attorney general, in opposition.

¶3The petition by the respondent mother for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 111 Conn.App. 28, 958 A.2d 170 (2008), is granted, limited to the following issue:

¶4"Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court properly admitted statements under the residual exception to the hearsay rule?"

¶5The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18280.