Jimenez v. Aristeguieta’s Empirical Analysis
290 F.2d 106 · 1961
Citation profile
18 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently August 1996
18 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3184 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292
Relies on Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brimson · Textile Mills Securities Corp. v. Commissioner · Benson v. McMahon · Todd v. United States · Oteiza v. Jacobus
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“appeals from all final decisions of the district courts of the United States,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“any justice or judge of the United States, or any magistrate authorized so to do by courts of the United States or any judge of a court of record of general jurisdiction of any State”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.