Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 290 F.2d 301 - MacDonald Engineering Co. v. Hover

MacDonald Engineering Co. v. Hover’s Empirical Analysis

290 F.2d 301 · 1961

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently September 2017

17 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

110196119701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Duberstein D Stanton · Dagnello v. Long Island Rail Road · Muriel Jeanne Homolla v. Shirley C. Gluck · Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. W. E. Williams, Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. · Citizens Insurance v. Foxbilt, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * It is not disputed by appellant, that we must view the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff; that it is only the exceptional case in which the issue of freedom from contributory negligence should not be submitted to the jury — only where such negligence is so palpable, flagrant and manifest that reasonable minds may fairly reach no other conclusion; that if there is any evidence tending to establish plaintiff’s freedom from contributory negligence, the question is one of fact for the jury and doubts should be resolved in favor of such submission.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The verdict is both obviously large and surprising in comparison with the dollar figures of past verdicts in the area, but upon a basis of the evidence in the case from which the jury could have arrived at the amount, it neither shocks the conscience nor fails to effectuate justice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.