Page v. Work’s Empirical Analysis
290 F.2d 323 · 1961
Citation profile
76 federal appellate · 7 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 128 later decisions — most recently December 2006 · most notably Mortensen v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n (1977), Thornhill Publishing Co. v. General Telephone & Electronics Corp. (1979)
76 federal appellate · 7 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 18 (§ 7 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. · United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. · Times-Picayune Pub Co v. United States · Klor's, Inc. v. Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc. · International Salt Co. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 128 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The test of jurisdiction is not that the acts complained of affect a business engaged in interstate commerce, but that the conduct complained of affects the interstate commerce of such business.””
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the argument that the newsprint market suffered because [plaintiff] ceased buying newsprint when it went out of business is not convincing. There is no indication that [defendant who took over plaintiff's operation] purchased any less newsprint from out of state.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““The interstate trade or commerce in which plaintiff and defendants engage did not suffer any anti-competitive effects from the acts of defendants of which plaintiff complains.” 290 F.2d at 329 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.