Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 290 F.2d 696 - Thomas v. United States

Thomas v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

290 F.2d 696 · 1961

Citation profile

92
cited by 92 later decisions
4
states following
August 2012
most recently cited

69 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 92 later decisions — most recently August 2012 · most notably David Busby v. William C. Holman, Warden, Kilby Prison (1966), United States ex rel. Boucher v. Reincke (1965)

69 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions

720196119701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Edwards v. United States · United States v. Sturm · Berg v. United States · Hall v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 92 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The conviction and sentence which follow a plea of guilty are based solely and entirely upon said plea and not upon any evidence which may have been improperly acquired by the prosecuting authorities.”
    15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.