Angulo-Dominguez v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
290 F.3d 1147 · 2002
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 802 (§ 102 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1259 (§ 249 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Landgraf v. USI Film Products · Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Enrico St Cyr · Tapia-Acuna v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Octavia Beltran-Tirado v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Paul Bowen v. Robert a Hood Fci
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.