In RE: BRUCE EDWARD BABBITT (Babbitt Fee Application)’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
March 2006
most recently cited
Relationships
Relies on Olson v. 86-1 · In Re Oliver L. North (Dutton Fee Application) · In Re Oliver L. North (Bush Fee Application) · In re Sealed Case · In Re Raymond J Donovan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that there is nothing in the record or in the circumstances of Babbitt's alleged offenses that indicates that the Attorney General, if freed of the restrictions of the Act, would have subjected Babbitt to a lesser investigation, or perhaps exonerated him at the preliminary investigation stage.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The convoluted nature of the corruption involved and the high profile identity of the suspects and defendants would no doubt have resulted in a complex and lengthy investigation with or without an independent counsel.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“), for reimbursement of attorneys' fees in the amount of $4,163.61 that she incurred during and as a result of the investigation conducted by Independent Counsel (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.