Gettman v. Drug Enforcement Administration’s Empirical Analysis
290 F.3d 430 · 2002
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 25 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Sierra Club v. Environmental Protection Agency (2002), Biodiversity Legal Foundation v. Badgley (2002)
14 federal appellate · 25 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 801 (§ 101 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 811 (§ 201 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 812 (§ 202 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc. · Allen v. Wright · Friends of the Earth Incorporateds v. Laidlaw Environmental Services Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[p]articipation in agency proceedings is alone insufficient to satisfy judicial standing requirements”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In order to establish the existence of a case or controversy within the meaning of Article III, [a] party must meet certain constitutional minima,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sierra Club v. Perry“requirement that the party ... has standing to bring the action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sierra Club v. Perry
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.