Hochen ex rel. Estate of Hochen v. Bobst Group, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
290 F.3d 446 · 2002
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 11 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably United States v. Espinal-Almeida (2012), Currier v. United Technologies Corp. (2004)
10 federal appellate · 11 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Kumho Tire Company, Ltd., et al. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc., et al. · General Electric Co. v. Joiner · Weisgram v. Marley Co. · Katz v. City Metal Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“we may not consider the credibility of witnesses, resolve conflicts in testimony, or evaluate the weight of the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“only if, 'applying these standards, the evidence does not permit a reasonable jury to find in favor of' appellant[].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“ensuring that an expert's testimony both rests on a reliable foundation and is relevant to the task at hand,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.