Luckett v. Bure’s Empirical Analysis
290 F.3d 493 · 2002
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2680 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 5 U.S.C. § 102
Relies on Feres v. United States · Makarova v. United States · Malik v. Meissner · Crawford v. Cushman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 135 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he district court can refer to evidence outside the pleadings and the plaintiff asserting subject matter jurisdiction has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that it exists.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]f this Court affirms the district court's judgment, a Guard[ ]Technician may still assert claims arising under Title VII, where those claims arise `purely from the [Guard Technician's] civilian employment' and are not `integrally related to the military's unique structure,'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he court should consider the Rule 12(b)(1) challenge first since if it must dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, the accompanying defenses and objections become moot and do not need to be determined.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.