Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 290 F.3d 620 - Tigrett

Tigrett’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
April 2025
most recently cited

1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently April 2025

1 district ·

90200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Mathews v. Eldridge · Paul v. Davis · Siegert v. Gilley · Epperson v. Arkansas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) that the supervisor had actual or constructive knowledge that his subordinate was engaged in conduct that posed a pervasive and unreasonable risk of constitutional injury to citizens like the plaintiff; (2) that the supervisor’s response to that knowledge was so inadequate as to show deliberate indifference to or tacit authorization of the alleged offensive practices; and (3) that there was an affirmative causal link between the supervisor’s inaction and the particular constitutional injury suffered by the plaintiff.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “Whether a deprivation of constitutional rights has occurred is not dependent upon the subjective feelings or beliefs of a plaintiff. In order to properly maintain a due process claim, a plaintiff must have been, in fact, deprived of a constitutionally protected liberty or property interest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he Supreme Court has assumed, without actually deciding, that university students possess a 'constitutionally protectable property right' in their continued enrollment in a university.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.