In Re Equipment Services’s Empirical Analysis
290 F.3d 739 · 2002
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Pegram v. Herdrich · Pro-Snax Distributors Inc Andrews Kurth Llp v. Family Snacks Inc · In re Ames Department Stores, Inc. · United States Trustee v. Garvey, Schubert & Barer · Indian Motocycle Associates III Ltd. Partnership v. Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a)(1) After notice to the parties in interest and the United States Trustee and a hearing, and subject to sections 326, 328, and 329, the court may award to a trustee, an examiner, a professional person employed under section 327 or 1103— (A) reasonable compensation for actual, necessary, services rendered by the trustee, examiner, professional person, or attorney and by any paraprofessional person employed by any such person; and (B) reimbursement for actual, necessary expenses.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“On the other hand, if the relationship is a trust arrangement in which the attorney holds the retainer for the client as security for the payment of future fees, then the retainer so held, less any fees charged against it, constitutes the property of the client.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Under either one of these arrangements, the attorney acquires title to the retainer fee at the time he receives it, regardless of whether he thereafter performs legal services for the client.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.