Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 290 F.3d 822 - Wilhelm v. Boggs

Wilhelm v. Boggs’s Empirical Analysis

290 F.3d 822 · 2002

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
October 2016
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Mitchell v. Forsyth · United States v. Matlock · Johnson v. Jones · Illinois v. Rodriguez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he constitutional sufficiency of a co-tenant’s consent to enter and search ... “rests ... on mutual use of the property by persons generally having joint access or control for most purposes, so that it is reasonable to recognize that any of the co-inhabitants has the right to permit the inspection in his own right ...” .... [T]he “right” to admit the police to which Matlock refers is not an enduring and enforceable ownership right as understood by the private law of property, but is instead the authority recognized by customary social usage as having a substantial bearing on Fourth Amendment reasonableness in specific circumstances.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.