Owens v. Bowersox’s Empirical Analysis
290 F.3d 960 · 2002
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Williams v. Taylor · Edwards v. Arizona · Michigan v. Jackson · Oregon v. Bradshaw · Litwak v. Oscar Productions, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the state court's application of Supreme Court precedent must be not only erroneous but also objectively unreasonable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“evinces a willingness and a desire for a generalized discussion about the investigation”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.