290 F. Supp. 721 - Maybruck v. Haim’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

cited by 39 later decisions

states following

September 2006

most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently September 2006 · most notably Perrin v. Walker (1974), Fellhauer v. City of Geneva (1987)

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1446 · 28 U.S.C. § 1450 · 28 U.S.C. § 1653

Relies on Gulf Oil Corporation v. Gilbert · American Fire & Casualty Co. v. Finn · Koster v. Lumbermens Mut Casualty Co · Rogers v. Guaranty Trust Co. · In the Matter of Albertn Moore an Infant by Next Friend

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

““. . . affirmative conduct or unequivocal assent of a sort which would render it offensive to fundamental principles of fairness to remand . . . ” Maybruck v. Haim, 290 F.Supp. 721 (S.D. N.Y.1968);”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Transport Indemnity Co. v. Financial Trust Co. · 458 F. Supp. 2d 1314 - Beard v. Lehman Bros. Holdings, Inc.
““Where ... a state court invoked by [a] resident plaintiff[ ] is fully competent to adjudicate the issues, procedural statutory conditions precedent to removal should not be disregarded or treated lightly except where fundamental unfairness would ensue.” Maybruck v. Haim, supra, 290 F.Supp. at 724 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Irving Trust Co. v. Century Export & Import, S.A. · Manas Y Pineiro v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A.
“the 30-day limit for the filing of the removal petition ... is mandatory and cannot be extended by this Court”) (citations omitted). 41 . Whitaker, 261 F.3d at 202 (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. 399 F. Supp. 2d 340 - In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability Litigation

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.