290 F. Supp. 785 - Cranston v. Freeman’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2008
4 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1337 · 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 28 U.S.C. § 144 · 7 U.S.C. § 601 · 7 U.S.C. § 602 · 7 U.S.C. § 608C (Food and Agriculture Act of 1965)
Relies on Udall v. Tallman · Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation Same · Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation · United States v. Grinnell Corp. · United States v. American Trucking Associations
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“differential of the 1936 greater Boston order was an example, 38 recognized the savings in handling costs when milk in fluid form is delivered to the city rather than first to a country plant. Provision is now made for this differential in the Massachusetts-Rhode Island order as a fixed portion of the zone differential. 39 As we held in Blair, 68 it is plain that this type of allowance turns not on the location of the producer's farms but on the nature of the market to which they deliver their milk. The”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Zuber v. Allen“concurs with the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia that the uniform price requirement was designed to eliminate ruinous competition for the fluid milk market, it cannot concur in [that Court's] conclusion that the requirement prohibits recognition of the historic fact that farmers located in particular areas near the market were accorded a greater share of that market.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Zuber v. Allen“these terms [of Section 8c(5)] follow the methods employed by cooperative associations of producers prior to the enactment of the Agricultural Adjustment Act [of 1933] and the provisions of licenses issued pursuant to the present [Act]. * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Zuber v. Allen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.