Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 290 FSUPP2D 71 - United States v. Ponds

United States v. Ponds’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
July 2006
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 6002 · 26 U.S.C. § 7201 · 26 U.S.C. § 7203

Relies on Kastigar v. United States · Fisher v. United States · Ullmann v. United States · United States v. Doe · Doe v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “18 U.S.C. § 6002 provides that: no testimony or other information compelled under [an immunity] order (or any information directly or indirectly derived from such testimony or other information) may be used against the witness in any criminal case, except a prosecution for perjury, giving a false statement, or otherwise failing to comply with the order.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.