Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 290 Kan. 209 - State v. Copes

State v. Copes’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
2
states following
April 2020
most recently cited

30 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Santobello v. New York · County of Los Angeles v. Chavez-Salido · State v. Robinson · State v. Ortega-Cadelan · In the Matter of Jensen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[A] district court must take into account the defendant’s financial resources and the burden of the fine when considering the method of payment of a fine for a fourth or subsequent DUI offense, i.e., whether the defendant must pay a monetary fine or provide community service under K.S.A. 2009 Supp. 8-1567(j).” State v. Copes, 290 Kan. 209, 223 , 224 P.3d 571 (2010).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““In lieu of payment of a fine imposed pursuant to this section, the court may order that the person perform community service specified by the court. The person shall receive a credit on tire fine imposed in an amount equal to $5 for each full hour spent by tire person in the specified community service. The community service ordered by the court shall be required to be performed not later than one year after the fine is imposed or by an earlier date specified by the court. If by tire required date the person performs an insufficient amount of community service to reduce to zero the portion of the fine required to be paid by the person, the remaining balance of the fine shall become due on that date.” (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.