State v. Gilley’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 2015
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Booker · State v. Arnett · State Ex Rel. Stovall v. Meneley · In re K.M.H. · In Re KMH
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(2) On a first conviction of a violation of this section, in addition to any other sentence imposed, a person shall be fined the lesser of the amount of the forged instrument or $500. “(3) On a second conviction of a violation of this section, a person shall be required to serve at least 30 days’ imprisonment as a condition of probation, and fined the lesser of the amount of die forged instrument or $1,000. “(4) On a third or subsequent conviction of a violation of diis section, a person shall be required to serve at least 45 days’ imprisonment as a condition of probation, and fined die lesser of the amount of the forged instrument or $2,500. “(5) The person convicted shall not be eligible for release on probation, suspension or reduction of sentence or parole until the person has served the mandatory sentence as provided herein.” K.S.A. 21-3710(b)(2)-(5).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Arnett“(1) Did Arnett’s three current forgeiy convictions in case No. 07 CR 404 provide a basis for treating her forgery conviction in Count 1 of that case as a third conviction; (2) did the use of a conviction for both the purposes of the progressive sentencing scheme under K.S.A. 21-3710(b) and the calculation of a defendant’s criminal history violate K.S.A. 21-4710(d)(ll); and (3) did the trial court err in setting defendant’s criminal history as category F?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Arnett
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.