State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
September 2024
most recently cited
32 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Faretta v. California · Arizona v. Fulminante · Gerstein v. Pugh · Sullivan v. Louisiana · McKaskle v. Wiggins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] defendant who clearly and unequivocally expresses a wish to proceed pro se has the right to represent himself or herself after a knowing and intelligent waiver of his or her right to counsel.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Bass · State v. Kemmerly“As a general principle, after an accused has gone to trial and has been found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, any error at the preliminary hearing stage is considered harmless unless it appears that the error caused prejudice at trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. McNellis“The reasoning by the Supreme Court in Faretta supports the conclusion that the right to self-representation extends to all phases of the criminal proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Bass
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.