Holt v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
34 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Link v. Wabash Railroad · Chambers v. Nasco, Inc. · State v. Simpson · In Re Michael Sindram
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under K.S.A. 60-1507, a district court must conduct an evidentiary hearing unless the motion, files, and records of the case conclusively show that the movant is not entitled to relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Brown v. State“Blanket prohibitions, however, would deny a party's future access to the courts and constitute an over extension of the inherent authority.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Zorn v. Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.