Zeitz v. Mara’s Empirical Analysis
1939
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
September 1980
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Pierce v. Pierce · People v. Kasem · Pulford v. Mouw · People v. Engle · People v. De Meaux
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Examination of the authorities shows that, when it is claimed that a jury has been coerced into returning a verdict, all of the facts and circumstances must be considered as well as the particular language used by the trial judge.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gordon v. Samson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.