Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 290 N.C. 628 - Shore v. Edmisten

Shore v. Edmisten’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
4
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably United States v. Pierce (2002), Henry v. Edmisten (1986)

6 federal appellate · 31 state decisions

14019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fuller v. Oregon · 85 Wash. 2d 758 - State v. Gosby · Shenah v. Henderson · 56 Wis. 2d 666 - State Ex Rel. Commissioners of Public Lands v. Anderson · State ex rel. Rodes v. Warner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] state or a local agency can be the recipient of restitution where the offense charged results in particular damage or loss to it over and above its normal operating costs. ... It would not however be reasonable to require the defendant to pay the State’s overhead attributable to the normal costs of prosecuting him.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “When any person is convicted of an offense under [the Controlled Substances Act], the court may order him to make restitution in the sum of one hundred dollars ($100.00) to the State of North Carolina for the expense of analyzing any controlled substance possessed by him or his agent as part of an investigation leading to his conviction. Any funds received under this subsection shall be deposited in the General Fund.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “All moneys, stocks, bonds, and other property belonging to a county school fund, and the clear proceeds of all penalties and forfeitures and of all fines collected in the several counties for any breach of the penal laws of the State, shall belong to and remain in the several counties, and shall be faithfully appropriated and used exclusively for maintaining free public schools.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.