¶1Joseph D. Chavis, in pro. per.
¶2*34 Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen., Richard F. Kane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for State.
¶3Petition by defendant for discretionary review under GS 7A-31, 30 N.C.App. 75, 226 S.E.2d 389. Denied.
290 N.C. 778
229 S.E.2d 33
STATE of North Carolina v. Joseph D. CHAVIS.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided October 5, 1976.
Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1976-10-05
Relies on 30 N.C. App. 75 - State v. Chavis
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1976-10-05
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 2010
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Joseph D. Chavis, in pro. per.
¶2*34 Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen., Richard F. Kane, Asst. Atty. Gen., for State.
¶3Petition by defendant for discretionary review under GS 7A-31, 30 N.C.App. 75, 226 S.E.2d 389. Denied.