Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 290 N.W.2d 680 - Brim v. State

Brim v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
July 1985
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Engberg v. Ford Motor Company · In Re Blake's Estate · State v. Roth · In Re Metz'Estate · Imel v. Metz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Attorneys, as officers of the court, are presumed to do their duty as the law requires. Mere assertions or denials to the contrary by the accused do not entitle him to relief unless found to be true upon adequate proof, and the burden of establishing a basis for relief in a post-conviction proceeding rests on the petitioner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.