State v. Alexander’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
1 district · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently May 2019
1 district · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Blackledge v. Perry · Goss v. Board of Education · Morgan v. Devine · Lustig v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Except as provided in section 609.585, if a person’s conduct constitutes more than one offense under the laws of this state he may be punished for only one of such offenses and a conviction or acquittal of any one of them is a bar to prosecution for any other of them. All such offenses may be included in one prosecution which shall be stated in separate counts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gant“there is no need for a remand on this issue in this case because there is no possibility that vindictiveness was involved in the decision to amend the complaint”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jackson v. State“A prosecution for or conviction of the crime of burglary is not a bar to conviction of any other crime committed on entering or while in the building entered.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gant
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.