State v. Stroup’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 2007
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because the Oregon Constitution does not have a due process clause of its own, any pronouncement made by this court concerning due process * * * must rest upon the due process clause of the Constitution of the United States.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he defendant had not received notice of the defendant's suspension or revocation as required by ORS 482.570,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. DeMello“had not received notice * * * as required by ORS 482.570.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. DeMello
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.