290 Or. App. 282 - State v. Lulay’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “An erroneous decision to exclude evidence relevant to bias 'is reversible if it denies the jury an adequate opportunity to assess the credibility of a witness whose credibility is important to the outcome of the trial.'”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 297 Or. App. 299 - State v. Andrew

2. “to allow the trial court to consider a contention and correct or avoid any error, to allow the opposing party an opportunity to respond to a contention, and to foster full development of the record”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 295 Or. App. 156 - State v. Perez-Garcia

3. “[t]he credibility of a witness may be attacked by evidence that the witness engaged in conduct or made statements showing bias or interest.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 297 Or. App. 299 - State v. Andrew