Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1955
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
3
states following
July 1975
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 90 Okla. Crim. 435 - Hilyard v. State · Igo v. State · 61 Okla. Crim. 162 - Ex Parte Wray · 78 Okla. Crim. 407 - Abbott v. State · 36 Okla. Crim. 431 - Taylor v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is our further thought that even a number of errors are insufficient to cause a reversal where such errors are not prejudicial to the substantial rights of the accused, and where the evidence is conclusive of guilt as in this case.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Bernard v. State · Jones v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.