Jones v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
1955
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 2011
2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ely Walker Dry Goods Co. v. Smith · Oklahoma Nat. Bank v. Cobb · Hickey v. Ross · W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Groseclose · Noble v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It was there (Gilpatrick v. Hatter, Okl., 258 P.2d 1200 ) held that, ‘Moreover, the general rule is that he who asserts that a transfer is fraudulent as to creditors must assume the burden of such proof. This defendant failed to do. Noble v. Johnson, 145 Okl. 46 , 291 P. 26 ; Smith v. Felkel, 91 Okl. 184 , 217 P. 196 . Furthermore, where there are no actual creditors to be defrauded and there is only a mental purpose to hinder an imaginary creditor, equity will not withhold relief. Hickey v. Ross, 197 Okl. 543 , 172 P.2d 771 .’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ritter v. Quinn“. . . clear, satisfactory, and convincing . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.