290 Pa. Super. 344 - Commonwealth v. Everett’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
December 2005
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. Ingram · Commonwealth Ex Rel. Moszczynski v. Ashe · Commonwealth v. Kulp · 247 Pa. Super. 513 - Commonwealth v. Olsen · Commonwealth v. McCUSKER
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(30) Except as authorized by this act, the manufacture, delivery, or possession with intent to manufacture or deliver, a controlled substance by a person not registered under this act, or a practitioner not registered or licensed by the appropriate State board, or knowingly creating, delivering or possessing with intent to deliver, a counterfeit controlled substance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the production, preparation, propagation, compounding, conversion or processing of a controlled substance....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.