Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 290 SC 523 - State v. Patterson

State v. Patterson’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently February 2015

19 state decisions

901986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Lockett v. Ohio · Swain v. State of Alabama · Eddings v. Oklahoma · Barefoot v. Estelle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Information Not Subject to Disclosure: Except as provided [above] this rule does not authorize the discovery or inspection of ... statements made by prosecution witnesses or prospective prosecution witnesses provided that [(1)] after a prosecution witness has testified on direct examination, the court shall, on motion of the defendant, order the prosecution to produce any statement of the witness in the possession of the prosecution which relates to the subject matter as to which the witness has testified; and provided further that [(2)] the court may upon a sufficient showing, require the production of any statement of any prospective witness prior to the time such witness testifies. (Emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “South also contends the trial judge erred in refusing to permit defense counsel to ask the jurors hypothetical questions concerning the death penalty. Clearly, the questions would have been improper since the purpose of voir dire is to insure each juror can make a decision based on the evidence presented, rather than hypothetical evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “MR. DUSENBURY (Attorney for Skipper): So none of these witnesses will be permitted to testify? THE COURT: I don't know what they are going to say but I am telling you they will not be permitted to testify about his adjustability to prison life. [Parenthesis supplied].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.