Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 290 So. 2d 482 - State v. Bryan

290 So. 2d 482 - State v. Bryan’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently April 2015 · most notably Rose v. State (1982), 748 So. 2d 970 - Thomas v. State (1999)

1 federal appellate · 34 state decisions

13019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Allen v. United States · United States v. Bailey · State v. Marsh · 245 So. 2d 51 - Rigot v. Bucci · 239 So. 2d 136 - Lee v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"If, however, the majority of your number are for a conviction, a dissenting juror should consider whether his doubt is reasonable when it has made no impression upon the minds of other jurors, equally honest and equally intelligent. If, on the other hand, the majority of the jury is for an acquittal, a minority should ask themselves whether they might not reasonably doubt the correctness of their judgment, which is not shared by the majority of their fellow jurors."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"Standard 2.19 should be used in such cases as are appropriate henceforth, the charge given in the instant case was not erroneous. It was a balanced charge, urging neither acquittal nor conviction. The trial judge specifically stated that no juror was to abandon his conscientious convictions."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “charge has been implicitly approved in this state in the adoption of Standard Jury Instruction 2.19. So, the giving of the foregoing”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.