Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 290 SO2D 675 - Wood v. Beard

Wood v. Beard’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

84
cited by 84 later decisions
1
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

84 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 84 later decisions — most recently September 2015 · most notably 448 So. 2d 819 - Boyett v. Boyett (1984), 502 So. 2d 583 - Gordy v. Langner (1987)

84 state decisions

53019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fulco v. Fulco · Blow v. Lottman · Griffith v. Roy · State Ex Rel. Martin v. Garza · State Ex Rel. Martin v. Talbot

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “". . . The best interest of the minor is not served by denying parental custody after deciding which of two qualified, competing family groups can deliver a quality of child custody more pleasing to the court. A judicial comparison of qualified competitors for custody of a child does violence to the rule of `parental right.' . . ."”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"Plaintiff argues that only the juvenile courts have jurisdiction to interfere with parental authority. This is too narrow an interpretation of Griffith v. Roy, supra . We have previously held that the juvenile courts do not have jurisdiction over a dispute between private litigants for custody of a child not within the purview of R.S. 13:1570 et seq. In re Sherrill, 206 La. 457 , 19 So.2d 203 ; 19 Tul.L.Rev. 464. Plaintiff's ultimate argument is that the result of Griffith v. Roy, supra , is that no court may inquire into the fitness of a parent seeking custody while the marriage is in existence and there is no separation or divorce action pending. This argument ignores the universally recognized proposition that the state and its courts are always concerned with the welfare of the child."”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the paramount right to the custody of the child”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.