Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 290 So. 2d 835 - State v. Reed

290 So. 2d 835 - State v. Reed’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 1991
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 1991

3 state decisions

10197419801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mattox v. United States · Universal Builders, Inc. v. Clark · 58 Cal. 2d 304 - People v. Rosoto · Carver v. United States · 139 Cal. App. 2d 485 - People v. Redston

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"This article has always been strictly construed. The proper foundation must be laid. State v. Rogers, 256 La. 447 , 236 So.2d 795 (1970). There has been no exception for the death of a witness; Demasi v. Whitney, 176 So. 703 (Orleans La.App.1937), or for rebuttal evidence, State v. Augusta, 199 La. 896 , 7 So.2d 177 (1942). This is also the general rule in the rest of the country as pointed out by McCormick in the 2d ed. of Evidence, § 37, note 52. See Mattox v. United States, 156 U.S. 237 , 15 S.Ct. 337 , 39 L.Ed. 409 (1895). The admission of the statement was reversible error because the codal requirement of laying the proper foundation was not complied with. The jurisprudence has construed this to mean there are no exceptions to this rule, not even for the death of a witness. The error was compounded by the fact that the statement was unsworn. C.Cr.P. Art. 776, State v. Bussey, 162 La. 393 , 110 So. 626 (1926)."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.