290 So. 2d 882 - State v. Ackal’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2014
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 277 So. 2d 126 - State v. Prieur · DeSimone v. United States · State v. Shaffer · Creighton v. Karlin · State v. Spencer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No customer ... of any bank ... who is allowed to withdraw any collateral pledged by him ... on a trust receipt or other form of receipt, shall: (1) Use, sell, repledge, or otherwise dispose of the collateral so withdrawn, for any other purpose other than that of paying the indebtedness for the security of which the collateral was pledged.... [[Image here]] Proof of any of the acts set forth in this Section shall be considered prima facie evidence of criminal intent. The pertinent part of the attempt statute, La.R.S. 14:27(A), states: Any person who, having a specific intent to commit a crime, does or omits an act for the purpose of and tending directly toward the accomplishing of his object is guilty of an attempt to commit the | (¡offense intended; and it shall be immaterial whether, under the circumstances, he would have actually accomplished his purpose.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“. . . [A] separate but lesser grade of the intended crime; and any person may be convicted of an attempt to commit a crime, although it appears on the trial that the crime intended or attempted was actually perpetrated by such person in pursuance of such attempt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“. . . For all other offenses not enumerated and listed in the above article attempt would be responsive.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.