¶2 Brock A. Griffith appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion in which he alleged that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. On appeal, he presents two points, in which he claims that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to allegedly inadmissible testimony. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
290 S.W.3d 842
Griffith v. State
Decided September 1, 2009
Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2009-09-01
Decided 2009-09-01