Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 290 U.S. 179 - Bullard v. City of Cisco

Bullard v. City of Cisco’s Empirical Analysis

290 U.S. 179 · 1933

Citation profile

260
cited by 260 later decisions
17
cited 17 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

94 federal appellate · 21 district · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 260 later decisions (17 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2016 · most notably Edelman v. Jordan (1974), Moor v. County of Alameda (1973)

94 federal appellate · 21 district · 23 state decisions

640193319401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedBullard v. City of Cisco (from Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Black & White Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. Brown & Yellow Taxicab & Transfer Co. · Coal Company v. Blatchford · Crawford v. Neal · Williams v. Nottawa

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 260 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As the transfers under which the plaintiffs held the bonds and coupons were made to them as trustees, were real ... and invested them with the full title, they were entitled, by reason of their citizenship and of the amount involved, to bring the suit in the federal court. The beneficiaries were not necessary parties and their citizenship was immaterial.”); Bonnafee v. Williams, 44 U.S. (3 How.) 574, 577, 11 L.Ed. 732 (1845) (”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.