Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 290 U.S. 41 - Nathanson v. United States

Nathanson v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

290 U.S. 41 · 1933

Citation profile

1,158
cited by 1,158 later decisions
48
cited 48 times by the Supreme Court
48
states following
February 2025
most recently cited

329 federal appellate · 62 district · 529 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,158 later decisions (48 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2025 · most notably Illinois v. Gates (1983), United States v. Leon (1984)

329 federal appellate · 62 district · 529 state decisions — followed in 48 states

38301933194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedNathanson v. United States (from Third Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Boyd v. United States · Weeks v. United States · Gouled v. United States · United States v. Lefkowitz · Go-Bart Importing Co. v. United States

Cited together with Aguilar v. Texas · Jones v. United States · Spinelli v. United States · United States v. Ventresca · Giordenello v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,158 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A sworn statement of an affiant that 'he has cause to suspect and does believe that' liquor illegally brought into the United States is located on certain premises will not do.”
    22 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Mere affirmance of belief or suspicion is not enough.”
    22 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a mere affirmation of suspicion and belief without any statement of adequate supporting facts”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.