290 U.S. 585
Docket No. 138.
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdictional statement submitted September 9, 1933.
Decided October 9, 1933.
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1933-10-09
1 counsel of record
Relies on Village of Euclid Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co · Hadacheck v. Sebastian · Thomas Cusack Company v. City of Chicago
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1933-10-09
Cited by 5 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1995
1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Messrs. W. Frank Every and J. Purdon Wright for appellant. Messrs. R. E. Lee Marshall and Ernest F. Fadum for appellees.
¶3The motion to dismiss the appeal herein is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial .federal question. Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U. S. 365, 388; Cusack Co. v. Chicago, 242 U.S. 526; Hadacheck v. Los Angeles, 239 U.S. 394; Reinman v. Little Rock, 237 U.S. 171, 176, 177.