Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

291 A.D.2d 894

Walker v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 2002-02-01

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 2013

1 federal appellate ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-02-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1—Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Midey, Jr., J.), entered October 3, 2000, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

¶2It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed with costs..

¶3Memorandum: The Court of Claims properly denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the claim. Defendant is not entitled to summary judgment based solely upon alleged deficiencies in claimant’s proof and thus failed to establish its entitlement to judgment in its favor as a matter of law (see, Hicks v City of Buffalo, 281 AD2d 922; see also, Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853). Present— Green, J.P., Pine, Kehoe and Gorski, JJ.

/291/ad2d/894 · .json · Public domain