State v. Das’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
56 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably Crawford v. Commissioner of Correction (2009), State v. Parker (2010)
56 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wainwright v. Sykes · State v. Golding · State v. Evans · Donovan v. Dewey · Johnson v. Commissioner of Correction
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] writ of error coram nobis is an ancient common-law remedy which authorized the trial judge ... to vacate the judgment of the same court if the party aggrieved by the judgment could present facts, not appearing in the record, which, if true, would show that such judgment was void or voidable”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“in criminal cases ... once a defendant's sentence has begun [the] court may no longer take any action affecting a defendant's sentence unless it expressly has been authorized to act”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““The judicial authority shall not accept the plea without first addressing the defendant personally and determining that he or she fully understands . . . “(5) The fact that he or she has the right to plead not guilty or to persist in that plea if it has already been made, and the fact that he or she has the right to be tried by a jury or a judge and that at that trial the defendant has the right to the assistance of counsel, the right to confront and cross-examine witnesses against him or her, and the right not to be compelled to incriminate himself or herself.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.